Any part of the deer or wild turkey divided shall have affixed thereto the name, date, address and big game license number of the person killing the deer or wild turkey and the sex of that animal. This information shall be legibly written in pen or pencil on any piece of paper or cardboard or any material which is attached or secured to or enclosing the part or parts. On lands enrolled in DMAP, deer management assistance tags must be attached and locked through the hock of the antlerless deer, (including those taken with bow, muzzleloader and those antlerless deer taken on either-sex days) in a manner that it cannot be removed, before the deer is moved from the site of the kill.
The Woodworth Shooting Range will be open for 4th of July Weekend!!!!! The range will be open Thursday-Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
The Woodworth Shooting Range is a free, public use facility owned and operated by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. The range offers a 100 yd rifle range, 50 yd pistol range, 5-Stand shotgun range, a 10 target 3-D archery trail, and a 50 yd static archery range.
All firearms must be unloaded with the actions open prior to entering the range.
The muzzle of all firearms must always be pointed in a safe direction.
Eye and ear protection must be worn when on the shooting range.
No person shall handle firearms or ammunition when the range is cold.
During a cease fire, all firearms must be properly cleared and racked with actions open.
No rapid fire. “Rapid fire” is defined as discharging more than one round per second.
Shooters must pick up their trash, including casings, and dispose of it properly.
Pets are not allowed on shooting ranges.
Only target frames provided may be used, unless approved by range officer on duty.
Shooters may have only one caliber of ammunition at the shooting bench at a time.
No alcoholic beverages are allowed on the range. Any person who appears by to have been consuming alcoholic beverages or is otherwise impaired shall be expelled from the range.
The use of profane language or language that is derogatory will not be tolerated and may be cause for expulsion from the range.
No tracer or armor piercing rounds may be used. No exploding targets may be used.
All users must abide by direction from the Range Officer. Range Officers are authorized to enforce these rules and expel uncooperative persons from the range or close the range if a situation warrants.
RANGE HOURS AND INFORMATION
* Special Note: Range is closed the third Saturday of each month from 8:00 AM to Noon *
RIFLE AND PISTOL RANGES
THUR - SUN 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. COST: FREE
Target frames, paper targets, eye protection, and ear protection are provided.
5-STAND SPORTING CLAYS THUR & FRI NOON - 5:00 P.M. SAT & SUN 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. COST: $5.00 per round (25 Clays)
By Mike Olinde, Research Program Manager and Dr. E. Jane Luzar, LSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
There has always been a great interest in duck hunting in Louisiana because of their abundant numbers in the state during the winter. However, with increased communication between hunters, between hunters and wildlife managers, and the use of mass communication, like internet websites and waterfowl forums, the interest in the processes by which ducks are managed and harvest regulations are determined has been heightened. Have you ever wondered how or what is the process for setting waterfowl regulations?
One of the first things you should know is that neither the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission nor the Department have the authority to determine the bag limit, season length or dates for waterfowl, better known as the Framework waterfowl hunting regulations. This authority lies with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) because of the migratory nature of the birds. The Service receives extremely broad guidance on how to manage this international resource through the Migratory Bird Treaty that includes the United States and the countries of Canada, Mexico, Japan, and the Soviet Union. Some of these agreements date to 1916. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 actually empowered the federal government to annually develop waterfowl hunting regulations. Our Commission can only select days, bag limit and dates within the framework of options permitted by the Service. This contrasts sharply with the Commission's total authority for the establishment of resident game seasons and bags.
The Service uses a number of surveys to annually monitor the size and distribution of waterfowl populations. These include May Breeding Population Surveys, May Pond Counts, Production Surveys, Migration/Mid-Winter Population Surveys, Harvest and Parts (Wings and Tails) Surveys and an extensive Leg-Banding Program. Some of these surveys date to the mid-1930's. The most comprehensive data collection efforts began in 1955 with the initiation of the May Breeding Population Survey. This survey covers some 1.3 million square miles with transects flown throughout most of the duck breeding habitat in the northern United States and much of Canada to count breeding pairs of 10 species of ducks. A sample of these aerial surveys is then checked on the ground to insure accuracy of the aerial data. Information from these collective surveys is considered each year when hunting regulations are established. The Department of Wildlife and Fisheries contributes annually to the Service survey process by conducting mid-winter aerial surveys in Louisiana and sending biologists to the annual Parts Survey (Wing Bee) and to Canada to assist in duck and goose banding.
National Regulatory Process
The states participate in the Service regulatory process through the Flyway Council system. There are 4 Flyways nationwide and Louisiana is in the Mississippi Flyway, which includes the 14 states roughly west of the Appalachian Mountain Range, and east of Texas. Each state and Canadian province has 1 member on the Council. This system was developed in the early 1950's as an administrative system to coordinate waterfowl hunting regulations and other conservation issues. A state's Flyway Council member is usually a high level administrative biologist of the state wildlife agency or its Director. A Flyway Technical committee, composed of waterfowl biologists, serves as consultants to each Council as they deliberate various waterfowl issues. Finally, the Service has a Service Regulations Committee (SRC), which is composed of 6 high level administrators, that listens to input from their staff, a Council representative, conservation organizations and private individuals. The SCR then makes its recommendation to the Director of the Service and the Secretary of the Interior who ultimately establish the regulation framework. As one might expect, this process has an extended timeline. The process begins in February and continues through early August when proposals by the Service are finally published and provided to the states and general public for comments or action
So what do biologists use to develop their recommendations at the Flyway level? Historically, the various surveys were used as general guides for recommendations. Today, a slightly different tool is used - in addition to the surveys.The management system known as "Adaptive Harvest Management" that was developed for use in the waterfowl regulation setting process. The Mallard Breeding Population and May Pond Counts on the breeding grounds are 2 factors that drive the Adaptive Harvest model used by the Service as a tool to determine the number of days of duck hunting and daily bag to allow. Under the system, there are currently 3 options: Restrictive, Moderate and Liberal. Depending on the option the model predicts, the season length can range from as few as 30 days to as many as 60 while the bag limit is either 3 or 6 ducks with varying restrictions on total mallards and hen mallards.
Daily Bag Limit (total/mallards/hen mallards)
Latest hunt date
(3 / 2 / 1)
Sunday nearest Jan. 20
(6 / 4 / 1)
Last Sunday in January
(6 / 4 / 2)
Last Sunday in January
State Regulatory Process
At the state level, once the Service has established the season length and bag limit frameworks, the Department makes hunting season dates and bag recommendations to our Commission. For the general waterfowl season, this is done at the August Commission meeting. The Department's biological staff uses a number of factors in developing its recommendation including historical duck migration patterns as determined by aerial surveys conducted by Wildlife Division personnel, historical marsh and weather conditions, and public input.
The waterfowl hunting season dates have traditionally opened in the West Zone of the state the first weekend in November when 55 days of hunting were allowed during the mid-1970's and early 1980's. This time was selected for a combination of reasons including (1) duck numbers, (2) water level conditions in the marshes and (3) traditional harvest area. Our waterfowl surveys have shown that large numbers ducks are in the coastal marshes during November, particularly blue-winged teal, green-winged teal, gadwall, wigeon, northern shoveler and northern pintail. Water level is generally lower in our coastal marshes during November as compared to December and January. As a result, duck feeding (and hunting) conditions are also generally better at this time for most coastal marshes.
Flooded agricultural lands such as rice and soybeans and bottomland hardwood forest are also important to ducks and duck hunters, but not as important as our coastal marshes. Size and availability of water certainly plays a role in determining this relative importance. For example, our coastal marshes cover some 4 million acres. In contrast, rice production generally occurs on about 600,000 acres in Louisiana of which about one-third is second cropped. Coastal marshes in southwest Louisiana provide vast areas of waterfowl habitat and account for the majority of the dabbling duck harvest in the state. As a result, coastal marshes are also extremely important to Louisiana waterfowling and its associated economics. For example, Cameron Parish, which includes almost 1 million acres of marshland, generally accounts for about 60-80% of the regional harvest and 30-50% of the statewide harvest of these ducks.
The tasks of recommending and establishing seasons are often difficult for the Department and the Commission. When it comes to the duck season for the West Zone, the dilemma is that marsh hunting is generally better in earlier November before the rains raise the water levels in the marsh. However, hunting is better in the rice country and other agricultural areas in late November and December after the rains flood the fields and marsh conditions have deteriorated. We attempt to accommodate (which often means develop compromises) sociological and demographic concerns when biology is not the primary issue. To this end, responding to input from the public, the opening date in the West Zone was moved to the second weekend in November and the second split closed later in January a few years ago. The East Zone season dates are usually later and run until the end of the framework.
An integral part of the process for setting waterfowl hunting regulations is providing opportunity for public input. Public comment periods are specified in the Federal Register to gather public opinion information prior to setting the Framework regulations. Similarly, the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission and the Department make regular press releases and offer time at Commission meetings to accept and record statements of public opinion. Prior to the 2005 season-setting process, the Department solicited public comment via this internet site to make it easier for hunters or other wildlife constituents to comment on proposed alternative waterfowl hunting regulations.
In a continuing effort to understand the desires of our hunters, the Department conducts periodic special surveys. In the spring of 2005, the Department, cooperating with the LSU School of Renewable Natural Resources conducted a mail survey of state duck stamp buyers. Over 6,000 waterfowl hunters were asked to share their opinions about recent waterfowl hunting quality in Louisiana and possible changes in the waterfowl hunting seasons structure and indicate their preferences for alternative management strategies. In addition, hunters were asked to provide information on their duck hunting characteristics. Preliminary results of this survey were presented to the Commission in November, 2005 and can be seen in the Research section.
As you can see, the waterfowl regulation setting process is quite involved. The Department listens and responds to constituent concerns. It is actively pursuing avenues and information that allow development of seasons which accommodate the hunting public's highly varied desires as much as possible.
The 2 waterfowl biologists in the Department's Wildlife Division are active members of the Mississippi Flyway Council Technical Section (MFCTS). The MFCTS consists of biologists from 14 states, roughly aligned between the Mississippi River drainage and the Appalachian Mountains, and the 3 Canadian provinces that make up the Mississippi Flyway. Along with biologists from federal agencies from the U.S. and Canada plus private conservation groups such as Ducks Unlimited, the MFCTS is the science and technology arm of the Mississippi Flyway Council. Their role is to gather scientific data to provide the biological foundation to be strongly considered in waterfowl-management decisions made by members of the Council, who are usually high-ranking employees of participating agencies and organizations. No doubt, the most anticipated actions the Flyway Council takes is the setting of waterfowl hunting regulations.
Unlike for resident game animals, annual migratory waterfowl hunting regulations must be coordinated through this multi-agency international organization adding complexity to the season setting process. Hunting regulations can vary annually based largely on wetland habitat conditions in northern breeding sites and the success of nesting efforts. The Technical Section analyzes the status of waterfowl and recommends annual hunting regulations to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Once hunting season packages are approved by the USFWS, Waterfowl Program biologists present Department recommendations to the Commission, hunting club groups and the media.
In addition to hunting regulations, the Section also coordinates and participates in flyway wide cooperative migratory waterfowl/wetlands research and management efforts. The goose neck collar program previously mentioned is an example of such a flyway project. The Waterfowl Program is responsible for preparing technical reports and publications on MFCTS activities and chairs several sub-committees within the MFCTS. Through the association with the MFCTS, one of the Program's biologists has been the Flyway's Representative on the Arctic Goose Joint Venture. This group consists of one representative from each of the 4 Flyways, federal U.S. and Canadians employees and provincial biologists. This Joint Venture primarily recommends and prioritizes goose research projects and coordination efforts associated with the current snow goose over- population crisis.
The importance of continued research in waterfowl ecology and management cannot be overstated. Our waterfowl resources are highly dynamic, with populations changing from year to year in response primarily to changing hydrology and land-use which affect habitat quality in both breeding and wintering areas. They are also highly mobile, and consequently, their distribution may change within a season related to weather, managed flooding, or hunting pressure. There are always questions needing answers to help us best use our time, effort, and money to most benefit waterfowl and maximize the benefits they provide to our sportsmen and wildlife enthusiasts.
The Waterfowl Program typically supports research projects as a partner in a multi-organizational effort. By providing financial support, vehicles, aircraft, personnel, lodging, or equipment, Program personnel assist with finding answers to questions that often help us better manage our waterfowl resources. Research projects also offer opportunities to train and assess young biologists who will provide their knowledge, skills, and unique views to our future waterfowl management.
Waterfowl Program biologists coordinate all aspects of the NAWMP for LDWF. This is an international wetlands/waterfowl restoration plan that uses partnerships with other government agencies, private landowners, and corporations to generate non-department funding sources to restore, protect, purchase and enhance wetland habitat on public and private lands in Louisiana and nationwide. Some of the activities under the NAWMP include the following:
DU MARSH and Duck Stamp Programs
Program personnel coordinate DU's MARSH (Matching Aid to Restore State Habitat). This is a reimbursement program that provides funding annually for development and restoration of wetland habitat on LDWF WMAs and Refuges. From 1985-2002 more than $1.5 million in grants were expended from the MARSH account on 18 WMAs and Refuges. They assist with the state duck stamp program which generates $500,000 annually for wetlands work and acquisition within the state. They also develop wetland project proposals in conjunction with regional Wildlife Division and DU biologists and engineers.
Wetlands Reserve Program and Louisiana Waterfowl Project
A waterfowl biologist serves as Department representative on the NRCS Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) Technical Subcommittee. The WRP is a feature of the 1995 Farm Bill. It was initially geared toward reforestation of previously cleared and farmed wetlands. Today, restoration of hydrology is an extremely important aspect of the program. Over 200,000 acres in Louisiana have been scheduled for reforestation to bottomland hardwoods and/or hydrology restored to date. Wildlife Division regional biologists developed projects on 2 WMAs that resulted in LDWF receiving more than $500,000 through the WRP during the past 3 years. The WRP Subcommittee is responsible for developing habitat criteria and ranking criteria for proposals in Louisiana.
The Louisiana Waterfowl Project is conducted in cooperation with DU, the NRCS, oil and pipeline companies and private landowners. Water control structures are designed from used gas pipelines. Technical assistance and wetland management plans are provided to the private sector to create seasonal wetlands that benefit a wide range of wildlife. Currently, 35,000 acres of wetlands are enrolled in 10 to 15 year agreements in 20 parishes under this program. As a result of observed benefits, other local landowners in some areas are developing their own projects. A waterfowl biologist also represents the Department on the Louisiana Waterfowl Project Committee.
North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA)
Program personnel develop and evaluate grant applications to this federal program to obtain grant funds to be used for wetlands acquisition and development projects on public lands. NAWCA grants require at least a $1 in non-federal matching funds for each $1 of grant funds requested. This is a major mechanism for generating conservation partnerships vital to the success of the NAWMP. In recent years, LDWF has partnered with NAWCA, DU, NRCS, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Exxon, local conservation organizations, the Walker Foundation, White Lake Foundation, and Richard King Mellon Foundation to acquire wetland habitats of value to waterfowl and other wetland birds as well as implement projects on 6 WMAs.
Louisiana has 2 active joint ventures of the NAWMP: the Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture (LMV) and the Gulf Coast Joint Venture (GC). Each joint venture has different goals and habitat issues that are addressed by NAWCA projects. Most of these restoration projects in the LMV involve a combination of reforestation to bottomland hardwoods and water control capabilities that permit precise water level management for wintering waterfowl. Once projects are completed specific management plans are developed to maintain wetland management units at maximum production. Program personnel work extensively with regional Wildlife Division biologists and specialists in implementing and evaluating wetland management practices on WMAs. The GC, on the other hand, is dominated by coastal marshes, prairies, and agricultural land, so projects focus on reducing salinity or wave energy to enhance submerged aquatic vegetation, re-establishing water-control to manage marshes for better production of seed-producing annuals, or creating capabilities to flood/manage agricultural areas for making winter food available for waterfowl.